More questions than answers….

In the last few weeks, I’ve been fortunate to have experienced interactions in rooms full of very smart people (irl and virtually). 

These ‘rooms full’ are from various capacities: the ME-038 Standards committee, two different pipeline design teams I’m advising, the APGA Research and Standards committee, a pipeline system operator I’m auditing, and several individuals who are in the process of signing up for the March cohort my AS2885 Pipeline Pathways training course.

If you’ve met me, you might have the sense that I favour asking questions over trying to answer them. I like being curious, and I thrive on conversations that go both ways: questions and answers from all participants.  I think back-and-forth discussions are the best.

In the last while, I’ve definitely been developing a list of more questions than answers in the AS2885 space.  These are questions, though, without a right/wrong, yes/no answer.  They are philosophical, grey, requiring judgement and a lot of ‘it depends’.  At least that’s how I’ve answered them in my mind. 

I’m not sure this blog/LinkedIn is the place to be answering them – mostly because I’m not sure the written word is fully reliable (AI anyone?). 

I’m contemplating a series of online ‘lunch n learn’ Q&A sessions to discuss these types of techno-strategic questions. I’m conscious that no one wants to give out free consulting services, and, we’d have to be careful about responsibility for answers (when there is so much grey). 

As an industry though, it feels like we’d benefit from a chance for curious people to have a community space for discussion … kind of like a mastermind group, I guess? 

So, my call to action here is not necessarily to answer the questions below here (though you can try if you want to!), but rather, would you be interested in monthly Q&A (‘series of queries’) type mastermind sessions, to tackle interesting questions like these?

Questions I have rattling around my to-do list, in no particular order:

  • How is a 50% design review different to a Safety Management Study workshop?
  • SFAIRP vs ALARP (that old chestnut).
  • Do we need to write original reports anymore, if AI does a good job of summarizing the meeting transcript?
  • How does this industry maintain high safety & reliability when the financial benefits are under so much pressure?
  • How can the AS2885 series evolve to reflect ‘pipeline systems’ (networks) and storage-bottle pipelines instead of the legacy style of “point A to point B long skinny thin wall” type assets?
  • How wide should a pipeline easement be?
  • On our operating pipelines, should we give more attention to corrosion issues, or to third party interference issues?
  • Why don’t we build pipelines that are 12mm thick, which virtually eliminates impact threats?
  • What is actually required to meet the compaction over pipelines requirement?
  • What is the damage mechanism that vibration causes to pipelines?

Failure is Normal …. and Bridges can fail more than once!

APGA has advertised for our next technical webinar, via an email sent today (Monday 16 May).

The webinar will be on June 15, 2022, at 12:30pm AEST presented by Ted Metcalfe.

Get on over there and sign up via the APGA events website.

https://www.apga.org.au/events/technical-webinar-failure-normal

The title is: “Failure is Normal”.

This is a concept that might be hard to agree with. Especially since engineers are generally tasked with preventing failure.

What we’re trying to address here is the idea that engineers should consider failure is ‘normal’, so that then we do everything we can to prevent it.

The email sent by APGA on Monday 16 May included dates for the bridge failures which weren’t quite correct. (“the Quebec Bridge in 1915 and the West Gate Bridge the late 1960s“).

Mea culpa, the ad copy I sent was an incoherent hybridised version of the dates … which was just confusing, for those paying attention.

Here’s the real story:

  • The Quebec Bridge actually failed twice during construction, first in 1907… and then again in 1916 when they were trying to rebuild it!
  • The West Gate Bridge was of the innovative box girder design, and in the time period 1969 to 1973, there were at least four failures of box girder bridges during construction around the world.  The design was so innovative that the bridges were failing faster than the design engineers could improve the design!

Tune in on June 15 to learn more about why building bridges is a challenge and what lessons we can still learn today from those events. And, how the failure themes on these bridges might apply to pipeline engineering, or, just being a conscientious professional engineer in whatever work you are doing.

Webinars – Demonstration of Conformance and others

The webinar on 4 August, 2021 (mentioned in an earlier post) was a very successful and popular session with a panel of presenters giving multiple perspectives on how conformance with AS 2885 can be demonstrated in a range of contexts. For those unable to join in, or who want to revisit any aspect, it was recorded and is now available for viewing here.

In fact there is a bunch of previous AS 2885 webinars here. Most run for about an hour but this latest one is about 2 hours because of the number of panellists.